Anti-modernization (also known as anti-modernisation or retraditionalisation),[1] is "a societal and cultural reaction to the unsolved 'reality problems' in the modernization model".[2] This mostly refers to an abstract concept or mode of thought characterized by supposedly "non-western," or "less privileged" nations and/or people in those nations antipathy or opposition to movements that attempt to have those nations become more "western." This could include disfavor of movements attempting to spread democracy, capitalism, or certain themes of social life present in more "western" nations or cultures.[3]
Boris Rumer wrote in his book Central Asia at the End of the Transition (2005) that "anti-modernization is appearing in all spheres of culture and economics. The retraditionalization of social life, deprofessionalization of entire strata of the population, the anti-intellectualism emanating from above, the exodus of skilled personnel from the country – these are all clear signs of the anti-modernization that characterizes the reality in post-Soviet Uzbekistan".[1] This constitutes an example of how some people in certain places view movements of modernization. People(s) involved with the anti-modernization movement sometimes perceive that western societies live in a culture that leads its people to be dominated by the people above them either economically or politically. This can be seen as severely negative and as representative of oppression.[4]
- ^ a b Rumer, Boris (2005). Central Asia at the End of the Transition (via Google Books). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1575-6.
- ^ Buttel, Frederick H.; Mol, Arthur P.J.; Spaargaren, Gert (2000). Environment and Global Modernity (via Google Books). London: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-6766-8.
- ^ Charlton, Bruce; Andras, Peter (2003). The Modernization Imperative. Imprint Academic. ISBN 9780907845522.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
:0was invoked but never defined (see the help page).