Calder v. Jones | |
---|---|
Argued November 8, 1983 Decided March 20, 1984 | |
Full case name | Calder, et al. v. Shirley Jones |
Citations | 465 U.S. 783 (more) 104 S. Ct. 1482; 79 L. Ed. 2d 804; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 41; 52 U.S.L.W. 4349; 10 Media L. Rep. 1401 |
Case history | |
Prior | Jones v. Calder, 138 Cal.App.3d 128, 187 Cal.Rptr. 825 (App. 2d Dist. 1982) |
Holding | |
A state's courts could assert personal jurisdiction over the author or editor of a libelous article, where the author or editor knew that the article would be widely circulated in the state where the subject of the article would be injured by the libelous assertion. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court within a state could assert personal jurisdiction over the author and editor of a national magazine which published an allegedly libelous article about a resident of that state, and where the magazine had wide circulation in that state.[1]