Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams | |
---|---|
Argued January 19, 2005 Decided March 22, 2005 | |
Full case name | City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams |
Docket no. | 03-1601 |
Citations | 544 U.S. 113 (more) 125 S. Ct. 1453; 161 L. Ed. 2d 316 |
Case history | |
Prior | Abrams v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 354 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2004); cert. granted, 542 U.S. 965 (2004). |
Subsequent | On remand, 406 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2005). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Concurrence | Breyer, joined by O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg |
Concurrence | Stevens (in judgment) |
Laws applied | |
42 U.S.C. § 1983, Telecommunications Act |
City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 544 U.S. 113 (2005), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Telecommunications Act (TCA) precluded damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983[1] because it provided a comprehensive remedial scheme. Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams is a part of the Sea Clammers Doctrine line of cases.[2]