| Submission declined on 5 July 2024 by 48JCL (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 14 February 2024 by The Herald (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by The Herald 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 December 2023 by Mach61 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Mach61 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 December 2023 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Jamiebuba 6 months ago. | |
Comment: All feels very promotional. If you have a WP:COI, please say so. 48JCL 12:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: External links should be removed or converted to inline citations where appropriate. Greenman (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Botond Feledy | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Nationality | Hungarian |
| Occupation(s) | Political analyst, consultant, journalist |
| Spouse | Katarina Durica |
| Parent(s) | Sarolta Monspart, Péter Feledy |
| Website | https://botondfeledy.com/ |
Botond Feledy (Budapest, 1981–) is a Hungarian media personality, journalist and foreign policy expert. He is the CEO of Red Snow Consulting[1] and the foreign policy expert of Partizán media, where has a weekly newsletter and various podcasts on geopolitics.[2] He is the founder of international political news platform Kitekintő, former dean of Saint Ignatius Jesuit College for Advanced Studies (between 2012 and 2017),[3] currently the deputy director of the Jesuit European Social Centre[4][5] in Brussels, director of the European Leadership Programme, and independent political analyst.
- ^ "Home". Botond Feledy. Retrieved 2023-12-12.
- ^ "Heti Feledy". hirlevel.partizanmedia.hu. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
- ^ Bárdos, Dávid (2017-06-26). "Sárvári Balázs váltja Feledy Botondot a rektori székben". Szent Ignác Jezsuita Szakkollégium (in Hungarian). Retrieved 2023-12-12.
- ^ "Our Team". Jesuit European Social Centre. Retrieved 2023-12-12.
- ^ "Jezsuiták". jezsuita.hu. Retrieved 2023-12-12.