 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,105 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
 | An editor has marked this as a promising draft and requests that, should it go unedited for six months, G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a dummy/minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] | contribs) 0 seconds ago. (Update) |  |
| Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 18 January 2024 by Spinster300 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Spinster300 10 months ago. | |
Comment: The section titled 'Articles', which looks like a list of some sort, is causing a flag for copyright violations of this page. As lists of this kind could be seen as unduly promotional, my advice would be to remove the list from the article body, and maybe add a simple External Link at the bottom of the article linking to the said page. - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Subject meets notability and references are independent. Should be ok under WP:BIO in my opinion...Geraldine Aino (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Brent C. Landau is an academic, author, biblical scholar,[1] lecturer,[2][3] and self-described "amateur astronomer"[4]. He is an "expert in ancient biblical languages and literature."[5][6][7] Landau is known in cademic circles for translating the Christian apocryphon "Revelation of the Magi" into English, and his book The Revelation of the Magi: The Lost Tale of the Wise Men’s Journey to Bethlehem, which includes an annotated translation of the Revelation of the Magi with commentary.[1][2][3]
- ^ a b Staff, Biblical Archaeology Society (2023-12-26). "Bible Scholar Brent Landau Asks "Who Were the Magi?"". Biblical Archaeology Society. Retrieved 2023-12-29.
- ^ a b "CURRICULUM VITAE BRENT CHRISTOPHER LANDAU" (PDF). Created 7/16/2021. Accessed 12/28/2023.
- ^ a b "Profile for Brent Landau at UT Austin". liberalarts.utexas.edu. Retrieved 2023-12-29.
- ^ "@BrentLandau" on Twitter - "Professional scholar of religion. Extremely amateur astronomer."
- ^ "Brent Landau: "Revelation of the Magi"". The Diane Rehm Show. December 20, 2010. NPR. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
- ^ Landau, Brent (2 November 2010). The Revelation of the Magi: The Lost Tale of the Wise Men's Journey to Bethlehem. HarperCollins. ISBN 9780062020239.
BRENT LANDAU received his Th.D. from Harvard University and is an expert in ancient biblical languages and literature.
- ^ "CURRICULUM VITAE BRENT CHRISTOPHER LANDAU". Created 6/3/2015. Accessed 12/28/2023.