| Part of a series on the |
| Anthropology of kinship |
|---|
 |
|
Social anthropology Cultural anthropology |
Fictive kinship (less often, fictional kinship[1][2]) is a term used by anthropologists and ethnographers to describe forms of kinship or social ties that are based on neither consanguineal (blood ties) nor affinal ("by marriage") ties. It contrasts with true kinship ties.
To the extent that consanguineal and affinal kinship ties might be considered real or true kinship, the term fictive kinship has in the past been used to refer to those kinship ties that are fictional, in the sense of not-real. Invoking the concept as a cross-culturally valid anthropological category therefore rests on the presumption that the inverse category of "(true) kinship" built around consanguinity and affinity is similarly cross-culturally valid. Use of the term was common until the mid-to-late twentieth century, when anthropology effectively deconstructed and revised many of the concepts and categories around the study of kinship and social ties. In particular, anthropologists established that a consanguinity basis for kinship ties is not universal across cultures, and that—on the contrary—it may be a culturally specific symbol of kinship only in particular cultures (see the articles on kinship and David M. Schneider for more information on the history of kinship studies).
Stemming from anthropology's early connections to legal studies, the term fictive kinship may also be used in a legal sense, and this use continues in societies where these categories and definitions regarding kinship and social ties have legal currency; e.g. in matters of inheritance.
As part of the deconstruction of kinship mentioned above, anthropologists now recognize that—cross-culturally—the kinds of social ties and relationships formerly treated under the category of "kinship" are often not predicated on blood ties or marriage ties, and may rather be based on shared residence, shared economic ties, nurture kinship, or familiarity via other forms of interaction.
In sociology of the family, this idea is referred to as chosen kin, fictive kin or voluntary kin. Sociologists define the concept as a form of extended family members who are not related by either blood or marriage. The bonds allowing for chosen kinship may include religious rituals, close friendship ties,[3] or other essential reciprocal social or economic relationships.[4] Examples of chosen kin include godparents, adopted children, and close family friends.[5]: 31–32 The idea of fictive kin has been used to analyze aging,[6] foreign fighters,[7] immigrant communities,[3] and minorities[8][9] in modern societies. Some researchers state that peers have the potential to create fictive kin networks.[10]
- ^ Déchaux, Jean-Hugues (2006). "Kinship Studies: Neoclassicism and New Wave . A Critical Review". Revue française de sociologie (in French). 47 (3): 591–620. ISSN 0035-2969.
- ^ Kemp, Jeremy H. (1983). "Kinship and the Management of Personal Relations: Kin Terminologies and the 'Axiom of Amity'". Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. 139 (1): 81–98. ISSN 0006-2294.
- ^ a b Ebaugh, Helen Rose, and Mary Curry. "Fictive kin as social capital in new immigrant communities." Sociological Perspectives 43, no. 2 (2000): 189-209.
- ^ Fordham, Signithia. "Racelessness as a factor in Black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory?." Harvard educational review 58, no. 1 (1988): 54-85.
- ^ Ciabattari, Teresa. Sociology of Families: Change, Continuity, and Diversity. SAGE Publications. 2016.
- ^ Mac Rae, Hazel. "Fictive kin as a component of the social networks of older people." Research on Aging 14, no. 2 (1992): 226-247.
- ^ Cerwyn Moore (2015) Foreign Bodies: Transnational Activism, the Insurgency in the North Caucasus and “Beyond”, Terrorism and Political Violence, vol.27, no.3, 395-415
- ^ Liebow, Elliot. Tally's corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
- ^ Stack, Carol B. All our kin. Basic Books, 1975.
- ^ Tierney, William G., and Kristan M. Venegas. "Fictive kin and social capital the role of peer groups in applying and paying for college." American Behavioral Scientist 49, no. 12 (2006): 1687-1702.