| Finley v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 28, 1989 Decided May 22, 1989 | |
| Full case name | Barbara Finley v. United States |
| Citations | 490 U.S. 545 (more) 109 S. Ct. 2003 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy |
| Dissent | Blackmun |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Tort Claims Act | |
Superseded by | |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1367 | |
Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (1989), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the jurisdictional requirements of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).[1] In response to the Finley decision, the United States Congress enacted a new statute on supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1367.[2]
- ^ "Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (1989)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2023-10-06.
- ^ Subrin, Stephen; Minow, Martha; Brodin, Mark; Main, Thomas; Lahav, Alexandra (2020). Civil Procedure: Doctrine, Practice, and Context (6th ed.). Aspen. pp. 914–917. ISBN 9781543820911.