Part of the Politics series |
Democracy |
---|
Politics portal |
A joint Politics and Economics series |
Social choice and electoral systems |
---|
Mathematics portal |
Part of the Politics series |
Politics |
---|
Politics portal |
In social choice theory, the majority rule (MR) is a social choice rule which says that, when comparing two options (such as bills or candidates), the option preferred by more than half of the voters (a majority) should win.
In political philosophy, the majority rule is one of two major competing notions of democracy. The most common alternative is given by the utilitarian rule (or other welfarist rules), which identify the spirit of liberal democracy with the equal consideration of interests.[1] Although the two rules can disagree in theory, political philosophers beginning with James Mill have argued the two can be reconciled in practice, with majority rule being a valid approximation to the utilitarian rule whenever voters share similarly-strong preferences.[1][2] This position has found strong support in many social choice models, where the socially-optimal winner and the majority-preferred winner often overlap.[3][4]
Majority rule is the most common social choice rule worldwide, being heavily used in deliberative assemblies for dichotomous decisions, e.g. whether or not to pass a bill.[5] Mandatory referendums where the question is yes or no are also generally decided by majority rule.[6] It is one of the basic rules of parliamentary procedure, as described in handbooks like Robert's Rules of Order.[1]
{{cite book}}
: |journal=
ignored (help)
We show that if the statistical distribution of utility functions in a population satisfies a certain condition, then a Condorcet winner will not only exist, but will also maximize the utilitarian social welfare function.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)