A joint Politics and Economics series |
Social choice and electoral systems |
---|
Mathematics portal |
A random ballot or random dictatorship is a randomized electoral system where the election is decided on the basis of a single randomly-selected ballot.[1][2] A closely-related variant is called random serial (or sequential) dictatorship, which repeats the procedure and draws another ballot if multiple candidates are tied on the first ballot.
Random dictatorship was first described in 1977 by Allan Gibbard, who showed it to be the unique social choice rule that treats all voters equally while still being strategyproof in all situations.[3] Its application to elections was first described in 1984 by Akhil Reed Amar.[4]
The rule is rarely, if ever, proposed as a genuine electoral system, as such a method (in Gibbard's words) "leaves too much to chance".[5] However, the rule is often used as a tiebreaker to encourage voters to cast honest ballots, and is sometimes discussed as a thought experiment.[6]
A voter is picked at random and the output ordering of the election is set to be the ordering given by that voter.
Each individual writes the name of a candidate on a ballot. The voters' ballots are collected and placed in a revolving drum. After shuffling, a ballot is chosen at random. The name on the chosen ballot is the elected candidate.
In other words, each voter writes his first choice on a ballot; a single ballot is drawn at random; and the choice on that ballot is selected.