Back نقد بلاغي Arabic Реторическа критика Bulgarian نقد بلاغی Persian Kritikai retorika Hungarian Criticism retoric Romanian
| Part of a series on |
| Rhetoric |
|---|
 |
Rhetorical criticism analyzes the symbolic artifacts of discourse—the words, phrases, images, gestures, performances, texts, films, etc. that people use to communicate. Rhetorical analysis shows how the artifacts work, how well they work, and how the artifacts, as discourse, inform and instruct, entertain and arouse, and convince and persuade the audience; as such, discourse includes the possibility of morally improving the reader, the viewer, and the listener. Rhetorical criticism studies and analyzes the purpose of the words, sights, and sounds that are the symbolic artifacts used for communications among people.[1]
The arts of Rhetorical criticism are an intellectual practice that dates from the time of Plato, in Classical Greece (5th–4th c. BC). Moreover, in the dialogue Phaedrus (c. 370 BC), the philosopher Socrates analyzes a speech by Lysias (230e–235e) the logographer (speech writer) to determine whether or not it is praiseworthy.
Criticism is an art, not a science. It is not a scientific method; it uses subjective methods of argument; it exists on its own, not in conjunction with other methods of generating knowledge (i.e., social scientific or scientific).[2]
The academic purpose of Rhetorical criticism is greater understanding and appreciation in human relations:
By improving understanding and appreciation, the critic can offer new, and potentially exciting, ways for others to see the world. Through understanding we also produce knowledge about human communication; in theory, this should help us to better govern our interactions with others.[3]
- ^ "Rhetorical Criticism". WikiMedia. Retrieved 17 February 2014.
- ^ Kuypers, Jim A. (2021). Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 25. ISBN 978-1538138144.
- ^ Kuypers, Jim A. Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action. p. 24.