Back نظرية التفاعل الرمزي Arabic Interaccionisme simbòlic Catalan Symbolický interakcionismus Czech Symbolsk interaktionisme Danish Symbolischer Interaktionismus German Σχολή της Συμβολικής Αλληλεπίδρασης Greek Interaccionismo simbólico Spanish Elkarrekintza sinboliko Basque کنش متقابل نمادین Persian Symbolinen interaktionismi Finnish
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Part of a series on |
| Sociology |
|---|
.svg) |
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that develops from practical considerations and alludes to humans' particular use of shared language to create common symbols and meanings, for use in both intra- and interpersonal communication.[1] This theory was founded by George Herbert Mead. According to Mead, symbolic interactionism is "The ongoing use of language and gestures in anticipation of how the other will react; a conversation".[2] According to Macionis, symbolic interactionism is "a framework for building theory that sees society as the product of everyday interactions of individuals". In other words, it is a frame of reference to better understand how individuals interact with one another to create symbolic worlds, and in return, how these worlds shape individual behaviors.[3] It is a framework that helps understand how society is preserved and created through repeated interactions between individuals. The interpretation process that occurs between interactions helps create and recreate meaning. It is the shared understanding and interpretations of meaning that affect the interaction between individuals. Individuals act on the premise of a shared understanding of meaning within their social context. Thus, interaction and behavior is framed through the shared meaning that objects and concepts have attached to them. Symbolic Interactionism refers to both verbal and nonverbal communication. From this view, people live in both natural and symbolic environments.
Symbolic interactionism comes from a sociological perspective which developed around the middle of the twentieth century and that continues to be influential in some areas of the discipline. It is particularly important in microsociology and social psychology. It is derived from the American philosophy of pragmatism and particularly from the work of George Herbert Mead, as a pragmatic method to interpret social interactions.[4][5]
- ^ Hall, Peter M. (2007). "Symbolic Interaction". Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss310. ISBN 9781405124331. Archived from the original on 2020-03-08. Retrieved 2017-01-24.
- ^ BERGER, CHARLES R.; CALABRESE, RICHARD J. (January 1975). "Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication". Human Communication Research. 1 (2): 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x. ISSN 0360-3989.
- ^ West, Richard L.; Turner, Lynn H. (3 March 2017). Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application (6th ed.). New York. ISBN 9781259870323. OCLC 967775008.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Caglar, Sebnem; Alver, Fusun (2015). "The impact of symbolic interactionism on research studies about communication science". International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 8: 479–84. ProQuest 1768593872.
- ^ Nungesser, Frithjof. 2021. "Pragmatism and Interaction." In: Routledge International Handbook of Interactionism, edited by Dirk Vom Lehn, Natalia Ruiz-Junco, and Will Gibson. London; New York: Routledge: 25-36. ISBN 9780367227708.