Taylor v. Taintor

Taylor v. Taintor
Argued January 6–7, 1873
Decided January 27, 1873
Full case nameWilliam Taylor v. Taintor, Treasurer of the State of Connecticut
Citations83 U.S. 366 (more)
16 Wall. 366; 21 L. Ed. 287; 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1168
Case history
PriorIn error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut
Holding
Bail will be exonerated where the performance of the condition is rendered impossible by the act of God, the act of the obligee, or the act of the law.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Salmon P. Chase
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller · David Davis
Stephen J. Field · William Strong
Joseph P. Bradley · Ward Hunt
Case opinions
MajoritySwayne, joined by Chase, Strong, Bradley
DissentField, joined by Clifford, Miller
Davis and Hunt took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Taylor v. Taintor, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 366 (1872), was a United States Supreme Court case. It is commonly credited as having decided that a person to whom a suspect is remanded, such as a bail bondsman, has sweeping rights to recover the suspect.


Developed by StudentB