| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Secondary? | Overall value toward ORGCRIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ Rows created with {{ORGCRIT assess}} ] | |||||
This template encloses one or more calls to template {{ORGCRIT assess}}. It generates a source assessment table, which contains assessments of sources with respect to the notability guideline for organizations (ORGCRIT). It is meant for use in deletion discussions.
The use of this template does not imply a final or consensus view of how any given source should be assessed. Though it may be used to summarize a developing consensus, it may also reflect the assessments of a single editor in the course of a discussion.
Background
[edit]ORGCRIT is a benchmark for assessing the presumed notability of organizations. From ORGCRIT:
"A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."
ORGCRIT and other guidelines expand on what is meant by "significant coverage", "reliability", "independence", and "secondary source". This template (with {{ORGCRIT assess}}) provides a visually clear means of presenting as assessment of sources against each of these three criteria, as well as an overall assessment derived from these criterion assessments.
Usage
[edit]{{ ORGCRIT assess table |
{{ ORGCRIT assess | ... }} <!--See description of arguments at {{tl|ORGCRIT assess}}-->
{{ ORGCRIT assess | ... }}
{{ ORGCRIT assess | ... }}
...
}}