Voting Rights Act of 1965

Voting Rights Act of 1965
Great Seal of the United States
Long titleAn Act to enforce the fifteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and for other purposes.
Acronyms (colloquial)VRA
NicknamesVoting Rights Act
Enacted bythe 89th United States Congress
EffectiveAugust 6, 1965
Citations
Public lawPub. L. 89–110
Statutes at Large79 Stat. 437
Codification
Titles amendedTitle 52—Voting and Elections
U.S.C. sections created
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the Senate as S. 1564 by Mike Mansfield (DMT) on March 17, 1965
  • Committee consideration by Senate Judiciary
  • Passed the Senate on May 26, 1965 (77–19)
  • Passed the House with amendment on July 9, 1965 (333–85)
  • Reported by the joint conference committee on July 29, 1965; agreed to by the House on August 3, 1965 (328–74) and by the Senate on August 4, 1965 (79–18)
  • Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 6, 1965
Major amendments
  • Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970[1]
  • Voting Rights Act of 1965, Amendments of 1975[2]
  • Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1982[3]
  • Voting Rights Language Assistance Act of 1992[4]
  • Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, César E. Chávez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. Velásquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006[5][6]
United States Supreme Court cases
List

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that prohibits racial discrimination in voting.[7][8] It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the civil rights movement on August 6, 1965, and Congress later amended the Act five times to expand its protections.[7] Designed to enforce the voting rights protected by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act sought to secure the right to vote for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Act is considered to be the most effective piece of federal civil rights legislation ever enacted in the country.[9] The National Archives and Records Administration stated: "The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the most significant statutory change in the relationship between the federal and state governments in the area of voting since the Reconstruction period following the Civil War".[10]

The act contains numerous provisions that regulate elections. The act's "general provisions" provide nationwide protections for voting rights. Section 2 is a general provision that prohibits state and local government from imposing any voting rule that "results in the denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen to vote on account of race or color" or membership in a language minority group.[11] Other general provisions specifically outlaw literacy tests and similar devices that were historically used to disenfranchise racial minorities. The act also contains "special provisions" that apply to only certain jurisdictions. A core special provision is the Section 5 preclearance requirement, which prohibited certain jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting without first receiving confirmation from the U.S. attorney general or the U.S. District Court for D.C. that the change does not discriminate against protected minorities.[12] Another special provision requires jurisdictions containing significant language minority populations to provide bilingual ballots and other election materials.

Section 5 and most other special provisions applied to jurisdictions encompassed by the "coverage formula" prescribed in Section 4(b). The coverage formula was originally designed to encompass jurisdictions that engaged in egregious voting discrimination in 1965, and Congress updated the formula in 1970 and 1975. In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the coverage formula as unconstitutional, reasoning that it was obsolete.[13] The court did not strike down Section 5, but without a coverage formula, Section 5 is unenforceable.[14] The jurisdictions which had previously been covered by the coverage formula massively increased the rate of voter registration purges after the Shelby decision.[15]

In 2021, the Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee Supreme Court ruling reinterpreted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, substantially weakening it.[16][11] The ruling interpreted the "totality of circumstances" language of Section 2 to mean that it does not generally prohibit voting rules that have disparate impact on the groups that it sought to protect, including a rule blocked under Section 5 before the Court inactivated that section in Shelby County v. Holder.[16][11] In particular, the ruling held that fears of election fraud could justify such rules, even without evidence that any such fraud had occurred in the past or that the new rule would make elections safer.[11]

Research shows that the Act had successfully and massively increased voter turnout and voter registrations, in particular among black people.[17][18][19][20] The Act has also been linked to concrete outcomes, such as greater public goods provision (such as public education) for areas with higher black population shares, more members of Congress who vote for civil rights-related legislation, and greater Black representation in local offices.[21][22][23]

  1. ^ "Public Law 91-285". June 22, 1970. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  2. ^ "Public Law 94-73". August 6, 1975. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  3. ^ "Public Law 97-205". June 29, 1982. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  4. ^ "Public Law 102-344". August 26, 1992. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  5. ^ "Public Law 109-246". July 27, 2006. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  6. ^ "Public Law 110-258". July 1, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2014. (amending short title of P.L. 109-246)
  7. ^ a b "History of Federal Voting Rights Laws: The Voting Rights Act of 1965". United States Department of Justice. July 28, 2017. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  8. ^ "Voting Rights Act". National Voting Rights Museum and Institute. Retrieved May 23, 2014.
  9. ^ Public Domain One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain: "Introduction to Federal Voting Rights Laws: The Effect of the Voting Rights Act". U.S. Department of Justice. June 19, 2009. Archived from the original on August 27, 2021. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference NARA20220208VRA1965 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ a b c d "Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al" (PDF). July 1, 2021.
  12. ^ "About Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act". U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved April 21, 2014.
  13. ^ Shelby County v. Holder, No. 12–96, 570 U.S. ___ (2014)
  14. ^ Howe, Amy (June 25, 2013). "Details on Shelby County v. Holder: In Plain English". SCOTUSBlog. Retrieved July 1, 2013.
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference Feder-2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ a b "The Supreme Court Deals A New Blow To Voting Rights, Upholding Arizona Restrictions". NPR. July 1, 2021. Archived from the original on December 26, 2021. Retrieved September 7, 2021.
  17. ^ Bernini, Andrea; Facchini, Giovanni; Tabellini, Marco; Testa, Cecilia (July 2023). "Black Empowerment and White Mobilization: The Effects of the Voting Rights Act". National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 31425. doi:10.3386/w31425.
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference Fresh-2018 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Cite error: The named reference Ang-2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ Shah, P. R.; Marschall, M. J.; Ruhil, A. V. S. (2013). "Are We There Yet? The Voting Rights Act and Black Representation on City Councils, 1981–2006". The Journal of Politics. 75 (4): 993–1008. doi:10.1017/s0022381613000972. hdl:1911/71875. S2CID 62823836.
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference Schuit-2016 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  22. ^ Cite error: The named reference Cascio-2014 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ Bernini, Andrea; Facchini, Giovanni; Testa, Cecilia (April 2023). "Race, Representation, and Local Governments in the US South: The Effect of the Voting Rights Act". Journal of Political Economy. 131 (4). Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press: 994–1056. doi:10.1086/722092. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 158339446.

Developed by StudentB