Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources

Discuss sources on the reliable sources noticeboard
To discuss the reliability of a source, please start or join a discussion on the reliable sources noticeboard (WP:RSN). Discussions on the noticeboard will be added to this list. This talk page is for discussing the maintenance of the list itself, and arguments posted here will not be taken into consideration.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reliable sources/Perennial sources page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:RSP

Reliability

This page is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ReliabilityWikipedia:WikiProject ReliabilityTemplate:WikiProject ReliabilityReliability articles

Wikipedia Help High‑importance

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles
High	This page has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This project page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Samantha Cole (2 October 2018). "Wikipedia Bans Right Wing Site Breitbart as a Source for Facts". Vice.
Omer Benjakob (9 January 2020). "Why Wikipedia Is Much More Effective Than Facebook at Fighting Fake News". Haaretz.
Oliver Darcy (24 July 2020). "Wikipedia administrators caution editors about using Fox News as source on 'contentious' claims". CNN.
Palmer Haasch (24 July 2020). "After Wikipedia editors battled over citing Fox News as a source, administrators said it should be 'used with caution' for science and politics". Insider.
Noam Cohen (10 August 2020). "Why Wikipedia Decided to Stop Calling Fox a 'Reliable' Source". Wired.
Heather Kelly (15 January 2021). "On its 20th birthday, Wikipedia might be the safest place online". The Washington Post. And when it comes to those sources, there is of course a Wikipedia [page] that lists sources and rates them according to how reliable they are.
Stephen Harrison (1 July 2021). "Wikipedia's War on the Daily Mail". Slate.
Stephen Harrison (1 March 2022). "How the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Is Playing Out on English, Ukrainian, and Russian Wikipedia". Slate.
Maggie Harrison Dupré (29 February 2024). "Wikipedia No Longer Considers CNET a "Generally Reliable" Source After AI Scandal". Futurism.
Benj Edwards (29 February 2024). "AI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET's reliability rating". Ars Technica.
Christopher Harper (2 March 2024). "AI-generated content and other unfavorable practices have put longtime staple CNET on Wikipedia's blacklisted sources". Tom's Hardware.
Elia-Shalev, Asaf (18 June 2024). "ADL faces Wikipedia ban over reliability concerns on Israel, antisemitism". Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
"Wikipedia declares ADL 'unreliable' on Israel-Palestine conflict, antisemitism". i24NEWS. 19 June 2024.
Aaron Bandler (21 June 2024). "Wikipedia Editors Label ADL Only Reliable for Antisemitism When "Israel and Zionism Are Not Concerned"". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles.
Ben Brasch (26 June 2024). "Wikipedia defends editors deeming Anti-Defamation League 'unreliable' on Gaza". The Washington Post.
Aaron Bandler (11 September 2024). "Wikipedia's Fundamental Sourcing Problem". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles.

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.