This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2013) |
Xiang | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hunanese | |||||||||||
湘語/湘语 | |||||||||||
Native to | China | ||||||||||
Region | Central and southwestern Hunan, northern Guangxi, parts of Guizhou, Guangdong, Sichuan, Jiangxi and Hubei provinces | ||||||||||
Ethnicity | Hunanese | ||||||||||
Native speakers | 38 million (2021)[1] | ||||||||||
Varieties |
| ||||||||||
Chinese characters | |||||||||||
Language codes | |||||||||||
ISO 639-3 | hsn | ||||||||||
Glottolog | xian1251 | ||||||||||
Linguasphere | 79-AAA-e | ||||||||||
Chinese name | |||||||||||
Traditional Chinese | 湘語 | ||||||||||
Simplified Chinese | 湘语 | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hunanese | |||||||||||
Traditional Chinese | 湖南話 | ||||||||||
Simplified Chinese | 湖南话 | ||||||||||
|
Xiang or Hsiang (Chinese: 湘; Changsha Xiang: [sian˧ y˦˩],[2] Mandarin: [ɕi̯aŋ˥ y˨˩˦]), also known as Hunanese, is a group of linguistically similar and historically related Sinitic languages, spoken mainly in Hunan province but also in northern Guangxi and parts of neighboring Guizhou, Guangdong, Sichuan, Jiangxi and Hubei provinces. Scholars divided Xiang into five subgroups, Chang-Yi, Lou-Shao, Hengzhou, Chen-Xu and Yong-Quan.[3] Among those, Lou-shao, also known as Old Xiang, still exhibits the three-way distinction of Middle Chinese obstruents, preserving the voiced stops, fricatives, and affricates. Xiang has also been heavily influenced by Mandarin, which adjoins three of the four sides of the Xiang-speaking territory, and Gan in Jiangxi Province, from where a large population immigrated to Hunan during the Ming dynasty.[4]
Xiang-speaking Hunanese people have played an important role in Modern Chinese history, especially in those reformatory and revolutionary movements such as the Self-Strengthening Movement, Hundred Days' Reform, Xinhai Revolution[5] and Chinese Communist Revolution.[6] Some examples of Xiang speakers are Mao Zedong, Zuo Zongtang, Huang Xing and Ma Ying-jeou.[7]
Historical linguists such as W. South Coblin have been in doubt of a taxonomic grouping of Xiang.[8] However, counterargument suggests that shared innovations can be identified for Xiang.[9][10]